Comments on: Ergonomics advice does not always reflect the reality https://safetyatworkblog.com/2011/05/16/ergonomics-advice-does-not-always-reflect-the-reality/ Award winning news, commentary and opinion on workplace health and safety Tue, 15 May 2012 05:00:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.1 By: Australian financial newspaper discusses workstation ergonomics « SafetyAtWorkBlog https://safetyatworkblog.com/2011/05/16/ergonomics-advice-does-not-always-reflect-the-reality/#comment-4435 Tue, 15 May 2012 05:00:41 +0000 http://safetyatworkblog.wordpress.com/?p=8693#comment-4435 […] evidence, hazards, media, OHS, research, safety, wellness, workplace For some time, restricted posture at workstations has been identified as being unhealthy.  The Australian Financial […]

]]>
By: Col Finnie https://safetyatworkblog.com/2011/05/16/ergonomics-advice-does-not-always-reflect-the-reality/#comment-4434 Thu, 19 May 2011 01:41:56 +0000 http://safetyatworkblog.wordpress.com/?p=8693#comment-4434 Ergonomics may be one of those areas that demonstrate the best and the worst of OHS thinking. It\’s absolutely essential to have the most objective data on hand, whenever it is possible to get it (the best). Awful how dogmatism will be grabbed onto and is hard to prise from the grasp (the worst). And the latter thing seems to as much the fault of our love of a nice neat solution (as opposed to being prepared to constantly challenge, think-through and just keep our minds open.) Clearly, that thing of grabbing a solution and sticking with it through thick and thin is a universal human trait.

Ergos have been researching and publishing stuff on the problems with the old idea of a 90 degree position between thighs and spine might not be as good for ya as originally thought. Here\’s a link to a small but important study by the University of Alberta Hospital in Canada that talks about this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6187080.stm

I also foolishly failed to grab a copy of another ergo study done quite a few years ago that went a step further than the Canadian study and suggested that despite the conventional wisdom, the \”right\” seating position was the one that a person found most comfortable. O\’course that one is gunna mean a punter will have to be aware of what is the line between \”comfortable\” and doing naughty things like sitting on ya leg.

All up, this points to what I\’d regard as a sign of mature OHS thinking: being alive to new information, being mentally flexible and being prepared to challenge conventional thinking. Bugger of a thing really.

Much easier to stick with old ideas and buy all those lovely straight-backed office chairs; much harder to give staff seating options and to have \’em educated in making smart decisions for themselves about what is best for their bodies.

col@finiohs.com

]]>