I was wondering what your thoughts were on the comparison with the Category 1 offence and the new manslaughter offence Kevin? It appears the Cat 1 is more onerous to prove and yet yields a less onerous sanctions than the new IM provision. Would it not make sense to repeal the Cat 1 offence on that basis?

In any event, it certainly leaves little doubt as to its design and essentially abrogates the infamous decision in Salomon v Saloman [1897] AC 22 (the case that essentially created the foundations of our modern capital corporate). Even more important in this amendment is the independence of the prosecutor.