Comments on: Psychosocial hazards are now, formally, occupational diseases https://safetyatworkblog.com/2010/03/30/psychosocial-hazards-are-now-formally-occupational-diseases/ Award winning news, commentary and opinion on workplace health and safety Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:40:55 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.1 By: Tony Harrison https://safetyatworkblog.com/2010/03/30/psychosocial-hazards-are-now-formally-occupational-diseases/#comment-3130 Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:40:55 +0000 http://safetyatworkblog.wordpress.com/?p=6260#comment-3130 Kevin

It will be good to meet one day.

Cheers
Tony

]]>
By: Kevin Jones https://safetyatworkblog.com/2010/03/30/psychosocial-hazards-are-now-formally-occupational-diseases/#comment-3129 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:59:28 +0000 http://safetyatworkblog.wordpress.com/?p=6260#comment-3129 In reply to Tony Harrison.

Tony

Your comments are a good example of why the South Australian workers\’ compensation needs multiple service providers.

Over my time in business in Victoria I have swapped workers\’ compensation insurers once. I received better service and better negotiations on workcover premiums.

]]>
By: Tony Harrison https://safetyatworkblog.com/2010/03/30/psychosocial-hazards-are-now-formally-occupational-diseases/#comment-3128 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:54:24 +0000 http://safetyatworkblog.wordpress.com/?p=6260#comment-3128 Kevin,

I agree that the matters would be better dealt with in another jurisdiction that has the capacity to provide \”natural justice\”.

Your comment on workers compensation insurers being grouped with other insurers, I don\’t necessarily agree with. Consumers have choices in terms of how they interact with insurers of choice and there are many more legal remedies available if there is dissatisfaction, but in the workers compensation arena there are no choices and you have limited remedies so there is a substantial difference. The injured worker in effect loses control of his/her life.

Your comment on OHS laws is very relevant and yes, it is the foundation of the entire system, however it is not worth the paper it is written on if it is not adequately and consistently enforced.

]]>
By: Kevin Jones https://safetyatworkblog.com/2010/03/30/psychosocial-hazards-are-now-formally-occupational-diseases/#comment-3127 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:29:39 +0000 http://safetyatworkblog.wordpress.com/?p=6260#comment-3127 In reply to Tony Harrison.

Tony
I agree that the treatment of injured workers needs to be greatly improved and that claimants often feel helpless and \”drowning\” in bureaucracy and confusion. But I believe that this issue is best pursued under consumer protection laws. There are more opportunities for restitution and, perhaps, justice. There is more case law for lawyers to draw upon in preparing prosecution cases and, I believe, there are more appeal mechanisms.

I am not sure that workers\’ compensation insurers are a special case. I group them as part of the general insurance industry and, in this context, I wonder if the stressors related to workers\’ compensation insurance are any more common that the stressors with other insurance products, such as bushfire coverage, life insurance or health insurance. I would welcome thoughts on this perspective.

The OHS laws have a major role in preventing the injuries, illnesses and diseases and, I believe, that the strengthening and enforcement of these laws is an effective way of reducing the pain and costs of everyone associated with workers\’ compensation.

Kevin

]]>
By: Tony Harrison https://safetyatworkblog.com/2010/03/30/psychosocial-hazards-are-now-formally-occupational-diseases/#comment-3126 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:14:27 +0000 http://safetyatworkblog.wordpress.com/?p=6260#comment-3126 The relationship between the workers compensation authority and an injured worker by definition is an extension of the workplace and any resultant psychosocial issues arising as result of that relationship should also be included, where the management of claims is proven as the primary cause of said psychosocial disorder.

Maybe there is now room for claims to be made in relation to injured worker suicides, which should fall right into the \”psychosocial disease\” spectrum and therefore be eligible for compensation just for starters. There are very few injured workers who have been unfortunate enough to be on the workers compensation system for any length of time who have not developed a psychosocial disorder as a direct result of their case management. The volume of noise and complaints testifies to that.

The compensating authorities will need to tread very carefully as \”duty of care\” issues are now well and truly on the table and there are enough concerned people out here who will certainly be looking very carefully at this issue.

]]>